
Mission for Establishment of Human Rights in Iran
(MEHR IRAN)
|
|
Coalition
for the International Criminal Courts
|
|
Lawyers Committee for Human Rights FREQUENTLY
ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THEINTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT On July 17, 1998, the
international community made an historic step forward in the effort to end
impunity for international crimes. By a vote of 120 in favor and seven
against, delegates to the
Rome Diplomatic Conference adopted a Statute to create a permanent
International Criminal Court (ICC). The Lawyers Committee for Human Rights is part of an International
NGO Coalition for the Establishment of an ICC that is working to create an
independent, effective and fair court.
In an effort to facilitate understanding of the Statute, we offer
the following responses to some frequently asked questions about the ICC: When will the ICC begin trying cases? Although the Statute was approved in Rome, it will not enter into
force and the Court will not be established until 60 nations ratify it.
That process will take at least several years. How will the ICC be structured? The Court will be a permanent judicial body with headquarters in
The Hague (The Netherlands). It will have jurisdiction only over crimes
committed after the Rome Statute enters into force. The ICC is a
treaty-based body and will therefore not be an organ of the United
Nations. It will, however, be closely linked to the UN by means of various
formal agreements. Who will be the judges on the ICC? Initially, the Court will consist of 18 judges elected to
nonrenewable nine year terms by a two-thirds majority vote of the States
Parties to the Statute. Only citizens of countries that are Parties to the
Statute can be judges, and no two judges may be citizens of the same
country. At least nine judges
must have established competence in criminal law and procedure, while at
least five must have established competence in relevant areas of
international law such as international humanitarian law and human rights
law. In selecting judges, States Parties must take into account the need
for representation of the principal legal systems of the world, equitable
geographic representation and a fair representation of male and female
judges. The judges will be distributed among three divisions: pre-trial,
trial and appeals. Who will be the Prosecutor? An absolute majority of the States Parties to the Statute will
elect the ICC Prosecutor and one or more deputy prosecutors to
nonrenewable nine year terms. These individuals will be required to have
extensive practical experience in the prosecution or trial of criminal
cases. The Prosecutor will be authorized to initiate investigations upon a
referral either by the UN Security Council or by a State Party to the
Statute and, subject to appropriate safeguards, on his or her own motion (proprio
motu). The Rome Statute also provides for the establishment of an ICC
Registry. Will the ICC supersede national courts? No. A fundamental principle of the Rome Statute is that the ICC shall be "complementary" to national courts. This means that the Court must defer to a national criminal justice system, unless that system is genuinely unable or unwilling to investigate and prosecute crimes that would otherwise be within the ICC's jurisdiction. The Court may consider on its own motion whether it should defer to national proceedings, but the principle of complementarity can also be invoked by interested States (not just States Parties to the Statute) and individual suspects. The Statute spells out criteria that will guide the Court in determining the genuine inability or unwillingness of a national criminal justice system to bring perpetrators of crimes to justice. For example, inability is defined as "a total or substantial collapse or unavailability of [the] national criminal justice system." In order to make a finding of unwillingness, the ICC would have to determine that national proceedings were undertaken with an intent to thwart justice. In sum, the Court is not meant to replace national jurisdictions, but to provide a venue for prosecution and trial where domestic courts fail to do so. Do domestic remedies need to be exhausted before the ICC can take
up a case? Given the relationship to national courts explained above, domestic
remedies do not need to be exhausted before the ICC can take up a case,
because the ICC is not an appeals court. If a case has been genuinely
investigated or prosecuted at the national level, or is being investigated
or prosecuted, it will be declared inadmissible by the ICC. How will the ICC differ from the International Court of Justice
(the "World Court")? The International Court of Justice is one of the six principal organs of the United Nations, authorized to resolve disputes only among states. The ICC will have jurisdiction only over crimes committed by individuals. Over what crimes will the ICC have jurisdiction? Does the Statute
include crimes of sexual and gender violence? Article 1 of the Rome Statute specifies that the ICC will have
jurisdiction over "the most serious crimes of international
concern." These are: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity
and aggression. (The Court will be able to exercise jurisdiction over
aggression only after a definition of the crime has been agreed to and
included in the ICC Statute by amendment. The Statute specifies that any
amendment must be consistent with the role of the Security Council under
the UN Charter in determining that an act of aggression has taken place.) Genocide. It was universally accepted at the Rome Conference that
the ICC Statute should replicate the definition of this crime as
provided for in the 1948 Genocide Convention. Under the Convention
and the ICC Statute, genocide "means any of the following acts
committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national,
ethnical, racial or religious group as such: killing members of the group,
causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group,
deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to
bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, imposing
measures intended to prevent births within the group, forcibly
transferring children of the group to another group". Crimes Against Humanity. The ICC Statute codifies crimes against
humanity in a multilateral treaty for the first time since the Nuremberg
Charter. The ICC will have jurisdiction over such crimes whether committed
in armed conflict or peacetime and regardless of whether perpetrated by
state or non-state actors. A crime against humanity is defined in the ICC
Statute as an act committed as part of a "widespread or systematic attack against any civilian
population, with knowledge of the attack." The specific acts listed
include murder, extermination, enslavement and deportation, which were
provided for in the Nuremberg Charter. Similar to the Statute of the ad
hoc Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the ICC Statute also
provides that imprisonment, torture, rape and persecutions on political,
racial and religious grounds are crimes against humanity when committed on
a widespread or systematic basis. However, the ICC Statute further updates
the list of crimes against humanity by including "forcible transfer of
population," "other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of
fundamental rules of international law" (apart from imprisonment),
"sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced
sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable
gravity," "enforced disappearance of persons" and "the
crime of apartheid." The progress represented by codification of crimes against humanity
in the ICC Statute is offset somewhat by the inclusion of high
definitional and evidentiary thresholds that will restrict the Court's
effective jurisdiction over these crimes. War Crimes. Under the Rome Statute, the ICC will have jurisdiction
over war crimes committed in both international and non-international
armed conflict. The Statute reproduces the "grave breaches" provisions of the 1949 Geneva Conventions
constituting war crimes in international armed conflict and includes a
list of twenty-six other acts considered to be "serious violations of
the laws and customs" applicable in international armed conflict.
Among them is "rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced
pregnancyÉenforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence
also constituting a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions." A tremendous achievement of the Rome Conference is that states
finally agreed, by multilateral treaty, to explicitly attach international
criminal responsibility to certain war crimes
committed in internal armed conflict. Given that most conflicts in
the world today are internal, the importance of this step cannot be
overstated. Under the ICC Statute, individual responsibility may arise as
a result of serious violations of Common Article 3 to the 1949 Geneva
Conventions. This article prohibits "violence to life or
person," "outrages upon personal dignity," the "taking
of hostages" or the denial of the right to a fair trial to persons
taking no active part in the hostilities that constitute a
non-international armed conflict. The ICC Statute also categorizes twelve
other acts as war crimes when committed in that type of conflict. Among
them are: "intentionally directing attacks against the civilian
population" and "intentionally directing attacks against
personnel É material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian
assistance or peacekeeping mission." Crimes of sexual and gender
violence are also provided for. Similar to the solution adopted with respect to crimes against
humanity, the drafters of the ICC treaty set specific jurisdictional
thresholds over both types of war crimes as a way of restricting the
Court's reach. Under an unfortunate, last minute compromise struck at
Rome, the Statute also permits States Parties not to accept the Court's
jurisdiction over war crimes committed on their territory or by their
nationals for the first seven years after
ratification. How will cases come before the ICC? Under the Rome Statute the Court's jurisdiction can be
"triggered": - by any State Party to the Statute; - by the UN Security Council; - by the Prosecutor acting on his or her own motion (proprio motu).
There was widespread agreement in Rome that any State Party to the
Statute should be able to bring to the Prosecutor's attention a situation
in which crimes within the Court's jurisdiction appear to have been
committed and to request him/her to investigate. The UN Security Council
can also refer to the Court a situation in which crimes appear to have
been committed when it determines, under Chapter VII of the UN Charter,
that the situation represents a threat to peace or a breach of the peace.
In both cases, the Prosecutor
can decline to proceed with an investigation if he or she determines that
there is "no reasonable basis" to do so. Finally, the Prosecutor
may initiate an investigation on his or her own motion, provided that a
three-judge panel of the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber approves. Does the ICC have to obtain state consent to investigate a crime?
When the Security Council refers a situation to the Court, the prosecutor
may proceed against any individual, for any crime within the Court's
jurisdiction, in any country, without the consent of any state. When a State Party to the Statute has triggered the Court's
jurisdiction or when the Prosecutor wants to investigate proprio motu, the
Court can act only in cases involving the territory or citizens of
countries that accept its jurisdiction. A state accepts the Court's
jurisdiction either by ratifying the ICC treaty or by filing an ad hoc
declaration consenting to the Court's jurisdiction over the crime in
question. Given the restrictions on ICC effectiveness that flow from
this state consent regime, universal ratification of the ICC Statute is
extremely important. Will the Security Council be able to limit the ICC's reach?
Contrary to initial proposals, the ICC will not require Security
Council approval before starting proceedings. The Security Council can,
however, request the Court not to open proceedings, or to suspend
proceedings already underway, for a renewable period of 12 months by means of a UN Charter Chapter VII resolution. The
adoption of such a resolution requires nine votes, including the votes of
all five permanent Security Council members. A veto by one permanent
Security Council member would thus enable the Court to move forward. Will the Court be able to try heads of state and other government
officials? The Rome Statute applies to all persons, regardless of their
official position. The Statute explicitly provides that "official
capacity as a Head of State or Government, a member of a Government or
parliament, an elected representative or a government official shall in no
case exempt a person from criminal responsibility." Therefore,
immunity pleas based on official position will not be allowed in
proceedings before the Court. What about members of armed forces or of paramilitary groups? They can also be held responsible under the ICC Statute, both
for acts directly committed, as well as for acts committed by
subordinates. The Statute provides that a military commander, other
"person effectively acting as a military commander" or a
civilian commander, may be held criminally responsible for acts committed
by subordinates. The principle of command responsibility as phrased in the
ICC Statute is, admittedly, weaker than the standard enunciated in the
Nuremberg Charter. How are defendants' rights guaranteed? The procedural provisions of the Rome Statute are based on
international standards of fair trial and due process embodied in
international conventions and UN standards on the right to a fair trial.
Defendants' rights are guaranteed at all stages of the proceedings up to
and including appeal. Thus,
the right to counsel -- including the right to assignment of counsel in
case of indigency is guaranteed to both suspects and accused. The Statute
incorporates the presumption of innocence and does not permit trials in
absentia. In keeping with
current trends in international law, the death penalty is not provided
for. Are the rights of victims and witnesses protected? The Court is obliged to protect the safety, physical and
psychological well-being, dignity and privacy of victims and witnesses,
particularly where the proceedings involve crimes of sexual or gender
violence or crimes against children. The ICC will also be authorized to
"establish principles" on reparations to victims and to issue
orders directly against convicted persons specifying reparations, which
may include restitution, compensation and rehabilitation. It may also
order that reparations be made through a Trust Fund that will be
established for the benefit of victims of crimes within the Court's
jurisdiction. How will the Court's orders be enforced? States Parties to the ICC Statute have a legal obligation to
cooperate fully with the ICC. When
the Court, for example, issues an international arrest warrant, they have
a duty to arrest and transfer the suspect or accused to the Court.
To this end, they must ensure that there are procedures available
under their national law to enable cooperation with the Court. If the
Court's jurisdiction is triggered by the Security Council, the duty to
cooperate extends to all UN member states, regardless of whether they are
a Party to the Statute. Provisions on the consequences of non-cooperation are provided for
in the ICC Statute, although weaker than might have been hoped for. Where
a State Party fails to comply with a request to cooperate, the Court may
make a finding to that effect and refer the matter for further action to the Assembly of States Parties.
When the failure to cooperate arises out of a Security Council-triggered
proceeding, the matter may be referred to the Security Council. Where will sentences be served? Sentences will be served in States designated by the Court, from a
List of States that express willingness to accept prisoners. The ICC will
supervise the enforcement of sentences and the conditions of imprisonment. How will the Court be funded? The Court will be funded by assessed contributions from States
Parties to the Statute and by funds provided by the UN, particularly in
cases where costs arise from Security Council referrals. The ICC will also
be able to accept voluntary contributions from governments, international
organizations, individuals, corporations and other entities. What is the next step? Ratification by individual states of the ICC Statute is the most
pressing next step. As ratification proceeds, a Preparatory Commission
open to all states that signed the Final Act of the Rome Diplomatic
Conference will be meeting at UN headquarters in New York for a total of
eight weeks in 1999. The Commission is charged with drafting the ICC's
Rules of Procedure and
Evidence. It is also expected to elaborate the Elements of Crimes within
the Court's jurisdiction, draft a relationship agreement between the ICC
and the UN, establish financial regulations and rules and draw up a budget
for the first financial year. Where can you find out more about the ICC? The website of the "NGO Coalition for an ICC" (www.igc.apc.org/icc) is the most comprehensive source of
information on the ICC. NGOs can also join the NGO Coalition on the ICC
and receive its newsletter, the "ICC Monitor." For further information please contact the Coalition's
Secretariat at: NGO Coalition for an ICC c/o WFM 777 UN Plaza New York, NY 10017 USA Tel: (...1) (212) 687 2176 Fax: (É1) (212) 599 1332 E-mail: cicc@igc.apc.org The Lawyers Committee's website
(www.lchr.org), on which all the Lawyers Committee ICC briefing
papers and other materials are posted, is also at your disposal. We would
be happy to provide you with more information. Please contact us: Jelena Pejic
Senior Coordinator, ICC Campaign Tel: (...1) (212) 845 5253 Fax: (É1) (212) 845 5299 E-mail: europe@lchr.org Mireille Hector Coordinator, UN Program Tel: (...1) (212) 845 5241 Fax: (É1) (212) 845 5299 E-mail: uncoord@lchr.org |
MEHR IRAN
P.O. Box 2037, P.V.P.,
CA 90274
Tel: (310) 377-4590 ; Fax: (310) 377-3103
E-mail: mehr@mehr.org ; URL: http://mehr.org