Mission for Establishment of Human Rights in Iran
(MEHR IRAN)
|
Coalition
for the International Criminal Courts
|
Lawyers Committee for Human Rights FREQUENTLY
ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THEINTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT On July 17, 1998,
the international community made an historic step forward in
the effort to end impunity for international crimes. By a
vote of 120 in favor and seven against, delegates to the
Rome Diplomatic Conference adopted a Statute to create a
permanent International Criminal Court (ICC). The
Lawyers Committee for Human Rights is part of an International
NGO Coalition for the Establishment of an ICC that is working
to create an independent, effective and fair court. In
an effort to facilitate understanding of the Statute, we offer
the following responses to some frequently asked questions
about the ICC: When
will the ICC begin trying cases? Although
the Statute was approved in Rome, it will not enter into force
and the Court will not be established until 60 nations ratify
it. That process will take at least several years. How
will the ICC be structured? The
Court will be a permanent judicial body with headquarters in
The Hague (The Netherlands). It will have jurisdiction only
over crimes committed after the Rome Statute enters into
force. The ICC is a treaty-based body and will therefore not
be an organ of the United Nations. It will, however, be
closely linked to the UN by means of various formal
agreements. Who
will be the judges on the ICC? Initially,
the Court will consist of 18 judges elected to nonrenewable
nine year terms by a two-thirds majority vote of the States
Parties to the Statute. Only citizens of countries that are
Parties to the Statute can be judges, and no two judges may be
citizens of the same country. At
least nine judges must have established competence in criminal
law and procedure, while at least five must have established
competence in relevant areas of international law such as
international humanitarian law and human rights law. In
selecting judges, States Parties must take into account the
need for representation of the principal legal systems of the
world, equitable geographic representation and a fair
representation of male and female judges. The judges will be
distributed among three divisions: pre-trial, trial and
appeals. Who
will be the Prosecutor? An
absolute majority of the States Parties to the Statute will
elect the ICC Prosecutor and one or more deputy prosecutors to
nonrenewable nine year terms. These individuals will be
required to have extensive practical experience in the
prosecution or trial of criminal cases. The Prosecutor will be
authorized to initiate investigations upon a referral either
by the UN Security Council or by a State Party to the Statute
and, subject to appropriate safeguards, on his or her own
motion (proprio motu). The Rome Statute also provides for the
establishment of an ICC Registry. Will
the ICC supersede national courts? No. A fundamental principle of the Rome Statute is that the ICC shall be "complementary" to national courts. This means that the Court must defer to a national criminal justice system, unless that system is genuinely unable or unwilling to investigate and prosecute crimes that would otherwise be within the ICC's jurisdiction. The Court may consider on its own motion whether it should defer to national proceedings, but the principle of complementarity can also be invoked by interested States (not just States Parties to the Statute) and individual suspects. The Statute spells out criteria that will guide the Court in determining the genuine inability or unwillingness of a national criminal justice system to bring perpetrators of crimes to justice. For example, inability is defined as "a total or substantial collapse or unavailability of [the] national criminal justice system." In order to make a finding of unwillingness, the ICC would have to determine that national proceedings were undertaken with an intent to thwart justice. In sum, the Court is not meant to replace national jurisdictions, but to provide a venue for prosecution and trial where domestic courts fail to do so. Do
domestic remedies need to be exhausted before the ICC can take
up a case? Given
the relationship to national courts explained above, domestic
remedies do not need to be exhausted before the ICC can take
up a case, because the ICC is not an appeals court. If a case
has been genuinely investigated or prosecuted at the national
level, or is being investigated or prosecuted, it will be
declared inadmissible by the ICC. How
will the ICC differ from the International Court of Justice
(the "World Court")? The International Court of Justice is one of the six principal organs of the United Nations, authorized to resolve disputes only among states. The ICC will have jurisdiction only over crimes committed by individuals. Over
what crimes will the ICC have jurisdiction? Does the Statute
include crimes of sexual and gender violence? Article
1 of the Rome Statute specifies that the ICC will have
jurisdiction over "the most serious crimes of international
concern." These are: genocide, war crimes, crimes against
humanity and aggression. (The Court will be able to exercise
jurisdiction over aggression only after a definition of the
crime has been agreed to and included in the ICC Statute by
amendment. The Statute specifies that any amendment must be
consistent with the role of the Security Council under the UN
Charter in determining that an act of aggression has taken
place.) Genocide.
It was universally accepted at the Rome Conference that the
ICC Statute should replicate the definition of this crime as provided
for in the 1948 Genocide Convention. Under the Convention and
the ICC Statute, genocide "means any of the following acts
committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a
national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such: killing
members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to
members of the group, deliberately inflicting on the group
conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical
destruction in whole or in part, imposing measures intended to
prevent births within the group, forcibly transferring
children of the group to another group". Crimes
Against Humanity. The ICC Statute codifies crimes against
humanity in a multilateral treaty for the first time since the
Nuremberg Charter. The ICC will have jurisdiction over such
crimes whether committed in armed conflict or peacetime and
regardless of whether perpetrated by state or non-state
actors. A crime against humanity is defined in the ICC Statute
as an act committed as part of
a "widespread or systematic attack against any civilian
population, with knowledge of the attack." The specific acts
listed include murder, extermination, enslavement and
deportation, which were provided for in the Nuremberg Charter.
Similar to the Statute of the ad hoc Criminal Tribunal for the
former Yugoslavia, the ICC Statute also provides that
imprisonment, torture, rape and persecutions on political,
racial and religious grounds are crimes against humanity when
committed on a widespread or systematic basis. However, the
ICC Statute further updates the list of crimes against
humanity by including "forcible transfer of population," "other
severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of
fundamental rules of international law" (apart from
imprisonment), "sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced
pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual
violence of comparable gravity," "enforced disappearance of
persons" and "the crime of apartheid." The
progress represented by codification of crimes against
humanity in the ICC Statute is offset somewhat by the
inclusion of high definitional and evidentiary thresholds that
will restrict the Court's effective jurisdiction over these
crimes. War
Crimes. Under the Rome Statute, the ICC will have jurisdiction
over war crimes committed in both international and
non-international armed conflict. The Statute reproduces the
"grave breaches"
provisions of the 1949 Geneva Conventions constituting war
crimes in international armed conflict and includes a list of
twenty-six other acts considered to be "serious violations of
the laws and customs" applicable in international armed
conflict. Among them is "rape, sexual slavery, enforced
prostitution, forced pregnancyÉenforced sterilization, or any
other form of sexual violence also constituting a grave breach
of the Geneva Conventions." A
tremendous achievement of the Rome Conference is that states
finally agreed, by multilateral treaty, to explicitly attach
international criminal responsibility to certain war crimes committed
in internal armed conflict. Given that most conflicts in the
world today are internal, the importance of this step cannot
be overstated. Under the ICC Statute, individual
responsibility may arise as a result of serious violations of
Common Article 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. This article
prohibits "violence to life or person," "outrages upon
personal dignity," the "taking of hostages" or the denial of
the right to a fair trial to persons taking no active part in
the hostilities that constitute a non-international armed
conflict. The ICC Statute also categorizes twelve other acts
as war crimes when committed in that type of conflict. Among
them are: "intentionally directing attacks against the
civilian population" and "intentionally directing attacks
against personnel É material, units or vehicles involved in a
humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission." Crimes of
sexual and gender violence are also provided for. Similar
to the solution adopted with respect to crimes against
humanity, the drafters of the ICC treaty set specific
jurisdictional thresholds over both types of war crimes as a
way of restricting the Court's reach. Under an unfortunate,
last minute compromise struck at Rome, the Statute also
permits States Parties not to accept the Court's jurisdiction
over war crimes committed on their territory or by their
nationals for the first seven years after ratification. How
will cases come before the ICC? Under
the Rome Statute the Court's jurisdiction can be "triggered": -
by any State Party to the Statute; -
by the UN Security Council; -
by the Prosecutor acting on his or her own motion (proprio
motu). There
was widespread agreement in Rome that any State Party to the
Statute should be able to bring to the Prosecutor's attention
a situation in which crimes within the Court's jurisdiction
appear to have been committed and to request him/her to
investigate. The UN Security Council can also refer to the
Court a situation in which crimes appear to have been
committed when it determines, under Chapter VII of the UN
Charter, that the situation represents a threat to peace or a
breach of the peace. In both cases, the Prosecutor
can decline to proceed with an investigation if he or she
determines that there is "no reasonable basis" to do so.
Finally, the Prosecutor may initiate an investigation on his
or her own motion, provided that a three-judge panel of the
ICC Pre-Trial Chamber approves. Does
the ICC have to obtain state consent to investigate a crime?
When the Security Council refers a situation to the Court, the
prosecutor may proceed against any individual, for any crime
within the Court's jurisdiction, in any country, without the
consent of any state. When
a State Party to the Statute has triggered the Court's
jurisdiction or when the Prosecutor wants to investigate
proprio motu, the Court can act only in cases involving the
territory or citizens of countries that accept its
jurisdiction. A state accepts the Court's jurisdiction either
by ratifying the ICC treaty or by filing an ad hoc declaration
consenting to the Court's jurisdiction over the crime in
question. Given the
restrictions on ICC effectiveness that flow from this state
consent regime, universal ratification of the ICC Statute is
extremely important. Will
the Security Council be able to limit the ICC's reach? Contrary
to initial proposals, the ICC will not require Security
Council approval before starting proceedings. The Security
Council can, however, request the Court not to open
proceedings, or to suspend proceedings already underway, for a
renewable period of 12 months
by means of a UN Charter Chapter VII resolution. The adoption
of such a resolution requires nine votes, including the votes
of all five permanent Security Council members. A veto by one
permanent Security Council member would thus enable the Court
to move forward. Will
the Court be able to try heads of state and other government
officials? The
Rome Statute applies to all persons, regardless of their
official position. The Statute explicitly provides that
"official capacity as a Head of State or Government, a member
of a Government or parliament, an elected representative or a
government official shall in no case exempt a person from
criminal responsibility." Therefore, immunity pleas based on
official position will not be allowed in proceedings before
the Court. What
about members of armed forces or of paramilitary groups? They
can also be held responsible under the ICC Statute, both for
acts directly committed, as well as for acts committed by
subordinates. The Statute provides that a military commander,
other "person effectively acting as a military commander" or a
civilian commander, may be held criminally responsible for
acts committed by subordinates. The principle of command
responsibility as phrased in the ICC Statute is, admittedly,
weaker than the standard enunciated in the Nuremberg Charter. How
are defendants' rights guaranteed? The
procedural provisions of the Rome Statute are based on
international standards of fair trial and due process embodied
in international conventions and UN standards on the right to
a fair trial. Defendants' rights are guaranteed at all stages
of the proceedings up to and including appeal. Thus,
the right to counsel -- including the right to assignment of
counsel in case of indigency is guaranteed to both suspects
and accused. The Statute incorporates the presumption of
innocence and does not permit trials in absentia. In
keeping with current trends in international law, the death
penalty is not provided for. Are
the rights of victims and witnesses protected? The
Court is obliged to protect the safety, physical and
psychological well-being, dignity and privacy of victims and
witnesses, particularly where the proceedings involve crimes
of sexual or gender violence or crimes against children. The
ICC will also be authorized to "establish principles" on
reparations to victims and to issue orders directly against
convicted persons specifying reparations, which may include
restitution, compensation and rehabilitation. It may also
order that reparations be made through a Trust Fund that will
be established for the benefit of victims of crimes within the
Court's jurisdiction. How
will the Court's orders be enforced? States
Parties to the ICC Statute have a legal obligation to
cooperate fully with the ICC. When
the Court, for example, issues an international arrest
warrant, they have a duty to arrest and transfer the suspect
or accused to the Court. To
this end, they must ensure that there are procedures available
under their national law to enable cooperation with the Court.
If the Court's jurisdiction is triggered by the Security
Council, the duty to cooperate extends to all UN member
states, regardless of whether they are a Party to the
Statute. Provisions
on the consequences of non-cooperation are provided for in the
ICC Statute, although weaker than might have been hoped for.
Where a State Party fails to comply with a request to
cooperate, the Court may make a finding to that effect and
refer the
matter for further action to the Assembly of States Parties.
When the failure to cooperate arises out of a Security
Council-triggered proceeding, the matter may be referred to
the Security Council. Where
will sentences be served? Sentences
will be served in States designated by the Court, from a List
of States that express willingness to accept prisoners. The
ICC will supervise the enforcement of sentences and the
conditions of imprisonment. How
will the Court be funded? The
Court will be funded by assessed contributions from States
Parties to the Statute and by funds provided by the UN,
particularly in cases where costs arise from Security Council
referrals. The ICC will also be able to accept voluntary
contributions from governments, international organizations,
individuals, corporations and other entities. What
is the next step? Ratification
by individual states of the ICC Statute is the most pressing
next step. As ratification proceeds, a Preparatory Commission
open to all states that signed the Final Act of the Rome
Diplomatic Conference will be meeting at UN headquarters in
New York for a total of eight weeks in 1999. The Commission is
charged with drafting the ICC's Rules of Procedure
and Evidence. It is also expected to elaborate the Elements of
Crimes within the Court's jurisdiction, draft a relationship
agreement between the ICC and the UN, establish financial
regulations and rules and draw up a budget for the first
financial year. Where
can you find out more about the ICC? The
website of the "NGO Coalition for an ICC" (www.igc.apc.org/icc)
is the most comprehensive source of information on the ICC.
NGOs can also join the NGO Coalition on the ICC and receive
its newsletter, the "ICC Monitor." For
further information please contact the Coalition's Secretariat
at: NGO
Coalition for an ICC c/o
WFM 777
UN Plaza New
York, NY 10017 USA Tel:
(...1) (212) 687 2176 Fax:
(É1) (212) 599 1332 E-mail:
cicc@igc.apc.org The
Lawyers Committee's website (www.lchr.org),
on which all the Lawyers Committee ICC briefing papers and
other materials are posted, is also at your disposal. We would
be happy to provide you with more information. Please contact
us: Jelena
Pejic Senior
Coordinator, ICC Campaign Tel:
(...1) (212) 845 5253 Fax:
(É1) (212) 845 5299 E-mail: europe@lchr.org Mireille
Hector Coordinator, UN Program Tel:
(...1) (212) 845 5241 Fax:
(É1) (212) 845 5299 E-mail: uncoord@lchr.org |
MEHR IRAN
Tel: (310) 377-4590 ; Fax: (310) 377-3103
E-mail: mehr@mehr.org ; URL:
http://mehr.org