for Establishment of Human Rights in Iran
No to Extreme Policies of Military intervention/Dialog With the Islamic Regime
Yes to a Third Option:
Change by Iranians"
extreme policies of either attacking Iran or making friendly relations with the
Islamic Regime are both against the interests of the Iranian people and the
entire world. This black and white foreign policy has been mainly adopted and
dictated by the Islamic Regime and its Iranian lobby groups and individuals. The
rhetorical "regime change" stand of the
has been masterfully portrayed by the regime’s supporters as the
’s intention to resolve the conflict with IRI by force. By manipulating the
current antiwar sentiment of American public, they have promoted the other
extreme, the policy that advocates befriending the regime.
solution is neither the military intervention against
nor dialog with the Islamic Regime. There is a third option that, if
adopted, can eliminate the danger of the regime. "Third Option" argues
that the Iranian people are capable of changing the regime if the regime is not
supported by the West, and especially not by the U.S. Adopting this third option
will come at no cost to the American people. It merely asks the
to stop recognizing this regime, making financial deals with it, and
legitimizing it. A smart sanction against the regime will show the Iranian
people that the world community is with them and is willing to weaken their
enemy. This will encourage the people to arm themselves with the weapon of
nonviolence and civil disobedience and, by toppling this terrorist regime,
eliminate the dangers it poses to the world.
expect those who stand for democracy and human rights to support the "Third
Option" by demanding a real diplomatic and economical sanction against the
Please sign in by providing the following information.
First and Last Name
Position or affiliation (optional)
Country of residence
Go back to MEHR IRAN Home Page.